A few days ago the leaders of the three Detroit automakers sat down with Democratic leaders to discuss their dire situation.  It seems that they’ve done what they intended to do.  The leaders sent a letter to the treasury asking it to use part of the 700 billion bailout for financial institutions to help out GM/Ford/Chrysler.  However, given that GM has already asked the treasury and been told no, I doubt that this will work.  Still, it means that congress will probably do something, whether it be now or when Obama takes office.  The transcript of the letter is below:

Dear Secretary Paulson:

We are writing to request that you review the feasibility of invoking the authority Congress provided you under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) for the purpose of providing temporary assistance to the automobile industry during the current financial crisis. Under EESA, Congress granted you broad discretion to purchase, or make commitments to purchase, financial instruments you determine necessary to restore financial market stability. A healthy automobile manufacturing sector is essential to the restoration of financial market stability, the overall health of our economy, and the livelihood of the automobile sector’s workforce.

The economic downturn and the crisis in our financial markets further imperiled our domestic automobile industry and its workforce. On Thursday, we separately met with the leaders of the automobile industry, and its top union representative, to discuss the financial challenges confronting the industry and its workforce, and possible actions to address these challenges. We left the meetings convinced that our nation’s automobile industry - the heart of our manufacturing sector - and the jobs of tens of thousands of American workers are at risk. Friday’s news of the automobile industry’s record low sales figures only reaffirm the need for urgent action.

Were you to determine that the automobile industry is eligible for assistance under EESA, we would urge you to impose strong conditions on such assistance in order to protect taxpayers and maximize the potential for the industry’s recovery. An automobile industry that is forward-looking and focused on ingenuity, competitiveness, and the creation of green jobs for the future is essential to its long-term viability. Other taxpayer protections should mirror those required of financial institutions currently participating in the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), such as limits on executive compensation and equity stakes to provide taxpayers a return on their investment upon the industry’s recovery. Any assistance to the automobile industry should reflect the principles contained in EESA that guard against the need to recoup costs to the taxpayers.

We must safeguard the interests of American taxpayers, protect the hundreds of thousands of automobile workers and retirees, stop the erosion of our manufacturing base, and bolster our economy. It is our hope that the actions that Congress has taken, and that the Administration may take, will restore the preeminence of our domestic manufacturing industry so that it can emerge as a global, competitive leader in fuel efficiency and in new and path-breaking energy-efficient technologies that protect our environment. We appreciate your serious consideration of this request, and look forward to your response.

Best regards,

NANCY PELOSI       HARRY REID
Speaker of the       House Senate Majority Leader

Source: AP

So it would seem that Cerberus has no intention of not selling most of their stake in chrysler.  If Nissan had some to the table with more than 20% in their offer Cerberus probably would have taken more time to consider that deal.  For now we’ll have to settle for Chrysler making Nissan’s Titan and Nissan making a small car for Chrysler - if Chrysler is still around.

The US Treasury has told GM that no, it can’t have anymore billions of dollars, not yours.  GM was hoping that the bailout money would come before the election (or is it Cerberus that is on an accelerated time table?) in the amount of 10 billion.  So far the US has bailed out financial institutions (both GMAC and Chrysler Financial qualify) but has yet to aid any other sector.

The reason for the bank bailout is clear, if the banks fail then no more credit is available and no one can spend any money and we all get to see how our grandparents lived back in the 30s.  Even that bailout is not popular among many in the US, indeed, much of the money is going to bonuses to already really rich guys that ran their bank into the ground.  So when another big corporation like GM comes to the US government and asks for some money the US is reluctant to say the least.

GM is a more sympathetic recipient than banks are, but not by much.  One could argue that the bailout would save manufacturing jobs in the US at a time when outsourcing is the norm.  Even though GM would have to slash about 50,000 jobs from Chrysler immediately, in the long run it saves the biggest automaker in the world.  Better to see one absorbed than both die off.

There are two problems with giving taxpayer money to GM.  First, it is not clear that GM and Chrysler will both fail if left separate.  No one has made a convincing argument there.  And (still part of the first reason) it is not clear that the combined company will succeed.  I have yet to see a convincing argument that shows me the combined GM/Chrysler company make it through the next few years of poor sales.

The second problem with US aide here is if they give it to GM/Chrysler for a merged company they also have to give it to Ford, and eventually anyone that comes begging.  The line of companies in trouble will never end, better to draw the line at the banks and be done with it than see the government as a partial owner in every sector in the US market.